Slavery
and Freedom—why did slavery and freedom grow together in British North America?
The Triangular
Trade--involved trade among people on four continents: Europe, Africa, and North and South America (trade with the so-called "New World"--North and South American--is usually counted as one entity, making the trade three cornered). Europeans
benefited most directly by the triangular trade, since their ships did nearly
all of the transporting. The profits from this slave trade led to the growth of
the banking industry, and provided the financing for the Industrial Revolution. Africa provided most of the slaves for the Slave
Trade—and this trade controlled by Africans. African peoples along coast traded slaves
for European trade goods. Initially this meant cloth that Africans did not
manufacture themselves (particularly woolen goods) which were valuable because
of their novelty. Later, Africans acquired Firearms and Rum, like
the Native Americans; the acquisition of firearms and rum changed the
complexion of this trade, allowing those people who acquired firearms to
control and subjugate neighboring peoples—and to control the slave trade. Europeans also
sought gold from their African trading partners; largely from the so-called “Gold Coast,” located along the coastline of present-day Ghana. Slave acquired from a variety of sources in Africa were then transported across the Atlantic Ocean and sold to the highest bidder, who used the labor of these slaves to grow crops that were desirable in the trade--gold, sugar cane, tobacco, rice, and eventually cotton. Eventually, the labor of slaves was used to create many manufactured goods, as well, which many non-slave workers found threatening.
Slavery and the Middle
Passage—as slavery became more lucrative, slave ships transported greater numbers of slaves per voyage—meaning that slaves were packed tighter together. Typically,
about 10% of the Africans died on any given voyage. While not statistically
more significant than those Europeans who died on their own journey to the
Americas, it is qualitatively different because no Africans emigrated
willingly, while many Europeans—even those who became indentured servants—did.Statistically,
many more Africans were shipped to the Sugar Islands and Brazil over British
North America. On the eve of the American Revolution in 1770, about 20% of the
2.3 million people in British North America (about 460,000) were African or
African descendents.
Slavery in North
America—in British North America, slavery developed into three distinct
systems: the Chesapeake Slavery system, the Carolina Slaver system, and northern slavery. The Chesapeake Slavery was the oldest
form in North America, having been established in 1619 with the landing of the first slaves by Dutch slave traders. In the aftermath
of Bacon’s Rebellion—after 1680, labor in the Chesapeake region shifted from
mixed indentured servitude and slavery to the near exclusive use of slave
labor, used both on tobacco farms and later to grow wheat (to feed the slave
populations on the sugar islands, ironically. Slaves worked as workers in a variety of occupations as workers, including cultivation
of crops (tobacco, wheat), as house
servants, and as skilled
and semi-skilled workers, which made the slave South less attractive to
European immigrants, particularly during the 19th century. Slavery
moved westward with the country, and as the population moved west, so did slavery (Thomas Jefferson).
Because slave owners produced greater wealth for themselves, they were able to
buy the best land in these western areas, which in turn allowed them to
continue to create more wealth, and created a social and political elite in the
region that allowed the interests of slave holders to predominate. The racial
foundations of slavery—the perception of race (remember, race is a social
construct) developed later.
In the Carolinas initially, Indian
Slavery—the earliest slaves in Carolina were Indians, largely supplied by the
Creek people—until they realized that they themselves could become slaves, and
which time the withdrew from trade relations with English colonists in favor of
trading with the Spanish in Florida, who no longer took many Indian peoples as
slaves. As Native American sources for slaves dried up, and England took
control of the transport of slaves from Africa, African slaves became more
prevalent in the Carolinas. Like many growers in Virginia, the road to riches in the Carolinas
was through providing foodstuffs for the slave workforce of the Sugar Islands
(since every available arable acre there was given over to the cultivation of
sugar cane. This led to the development of Task organization of labor. Task
organization of labor—slaves in Virginia were closely supervised, and had to
occupy all of their time with assigned jobs. In part, this was driven by the
fact that tobacco cultivation gained little because of efficiencies of scale
(workers could not be forced to work faster, because each tobacco plant needed
individual care). Rice plantations, on the other hand, gained greatly because
of economies of scale, because of the series of dikes that had to be
constructed to alternatively flood and drain the fields—but organizing slaves
using the task system, slave drivers allowed slaves greater freedom, in that
they were allowed to work for themselves when their assigned tasks were
completed. Slave populations grewafter African slaves were introduced to the Carolinas
(particularly South Carolina—North Carolina became a separate colony by the
1730s), they quickly made up the majority of the population. In part, this was
a consequence of the large numbers of slaves used in the cultivation of rice;
but Carolina planters also actively discouraged the settlement of poorer whites
in the colony, except on the poorest land (the Appalachian Mountains). Georgia largely
followed the Carolina model after the 1740s, when the resistance of the
colony’s proprietors (in particular, James Oglethorpe) was finally overcome
Northern
slavery—Overlooked in history largely, slavery also existed in the colonies of
the Middle Atlantic (New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania—all three states
retained slavery well into the 19th century, as well) and New
England. In Connecticut
and Rhode Island—tobacco farms and dairy farms in certain parts of these two
states led to them developing relatively large slave populations. In the
Middle Atlantic colonies—New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania all has a
significant number of slaves working on wheat farms, again largely for export of
foodstuffs for the slaves working on sugar plantations in the Caribbean.
Particularly in New York City and Philadelphia, however, slaves were also
employed as urban workers: stevedores (loading and unloading ships), as skilled
and semi-skilled workers in artisan shops—and as personal servants. Slaves in
the north were a sort of status symbol—by the early 18th century,
about 75% of the urban elite owned slaves employed as personal servants
Slave
Cultures and Slave Resistance--Africans did not arrive in the New World with a modern identity as African or especially as African Americans; they instead became these new entities we call African Americans. They did not arrive in America
as a single African people, but as many African peoples. They were bonded together because of
their state of bondage, not because of any “racial identity. African American culture
developed over a course of years, as new languages developed (ex. Gullah, and
other dialects that combined African and European languages—“creole”). African culture also
developed differently—and at a different pace—depending upon the density of
African American population. In the Carolinas
and Georgia, many Africans retained and developed African and Africa-based cultural practices,
which were particularly strong in those areas where African descendents made up
a majority of the population. In the Chesapeake region, African
American culture was different, because African American population remained in
close contact—and under close supervision—of whites. In the Middle
Atlantic and New England—because African Americans were largely dispersed in
both of these regions, it was much more difficult to retain and develop new
African cultural practices in these two regions.
Slave
Resistance--slaved also resisted their condition in a variety of ways: in everyday resistance methods like “Going
slow,” “acting dumb;” acts of sabotage, and in running
away. There were also organized rebellions like the Stono
Rebellion 1739-1740 and the NYC
burning(?) 1741.
Conclusion—As we saw in the reading of the complaint of
the indentured servant last week, many whites come to see their position as
undesirable, and compare it unfavorably
with the position that slaves held—but this was not done as an effort to
raise the conditions of slaves, but instead becomes a plea for white
solidarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment